For those of you already familiar with career development and organisational engagement, the information in this paper may not come as much of a surprise to you. However the paper does make some important distinctions on terms and discusses common pitfalls that managers can make when planning to engage high potentials.
I'll post some of the more interesting observations I gained below:
Firstly, there is a big difference between performance and potential. It makes a lot of sense once you think of it but before I saw this table I would have often placed them in the same 'mental pool' of thought. It is entirely possible for someone to a high performer with low potential, visa-versa and everything in between.
One quote I particularly like from the paper, probably because it sounds like it was pulled from an episode of Yes Prime Minister, was from one of the contributors, Abgeka Scapello “If you have aspiration without ability, then you are an incompetent dreamer.”
As a follow on from this chart (however in the actual document the chart is at the end) the paper outlines three key pitfalls or traps to avoid. The paper already does quite a good job of summarising end expanding on these points so I'll quote them below.
1.
Don’t
assume high potentials are engaged. It is vital that employers understand what drives engagement for
this key group. High potentials generally have higher expectations for how they
should be treated – starting with simply being identified as a high potential.
Senior leaders should double or triple their efforts in keeping young stars
engaged by:
·
Recognizing them early and
often
·
Linking individual goals to
corporate goals
·
Giving them opportunities to
help solve the company’s biggest problems
·
Regularly taking the pulse
of valued employees
While it’s important to acknowledge high
potentials, you must be cautious not to disenfranchise the rest of your organisation.
Consider how you recognise and reward other members of your workforce,
including offering career development opportunities to other key segments of
your employee population.
2. Don’t confuse high performance with future
potential. More
than 70% of today’s top performers lack critical attributes essential to their
success in future roles. The bulk of talent investments are being wasted on
individuals whose potential may not be that high.
There are three attributes that best
define stars: Ability + Engagement + Aspiration.
·
Ability:
Intellectual, technical and emotional skills to
handle increasingly complex challenges
·
Engagement:
Level of personal connection and commitment the
employee feels toward his or her role and to the firm and its mission
·
Aspiration:
Desire for recognition, advancement and future
rewards
3. Avoid delegating down management of top talent. Top talent is everyone’s
responsibility. It is a long-term company asset. Responsibility for high
potentials’ development must be shared by general managers. There is often an
assumption that line managers know their people best, but they should not have
the sole responsibility of managing top talent. What happens when management of
top talent is not shared?
·
Candidates are selected
solely on the basis of recent performance.
·
Candidates are offered
narrow development opportunities limited to their own business units. Managers
focus mostly on skills required now rather than tomorrow.
·
Employees are hoarded by
line managers and not shared throughout the organisation.
No comments:
Post a Comment